the nature of joyful destruction is the essence of graffiti... i find that the obsession with intellectual excrement is what is basically stated here... the fact is that this 'war' is due to an intellectual superiority complex... and its not going to go anywhere... mind you these dadaists need to realize that what they are doing has been done in europe by someone else (eg splashing paint on posh jewelry stores)
mejuan you are misunderstanding what graffiti is... and your attributing some type of label to it... there are really no boundaries outside of what your conceptual interpretation of it is.
for example, as the dadist goes on about this piece of paper that is coveted... what the street artist does is completely shit on that material validity by putting his work up in the street... i have no doubt that people are benefiting monetarily from these actions...and why not? because again it breaks one of your intellectual boundaries.
notice the hypocracy of the statement... you are asking for the joyful destruction of graffiti, yet requesting that your joyful manifesto is not destroyed as it is covered in glass.
keep going on and on about it... intellectual superiority regarding art is about as productive as putting big chunks of glass in wheatpaste... it doesnt do anything...
as someone else put it, "hey write that tripe and then have the nerve to call street art bourgeois? nice try, asshats.
ps. jealous that swoon is in moma and you're not much?" ... yep
as far as the graffiti/street art supporters who are getting bent out of shape over this... who gives a fuck... honestly the nature of our work is destructive, and if there is anything we should take from it, that is the 'joyful destruction' that the dadists are talking about.... as soon as we put our works on the street it is subject to decay and destruction... and that is the beauty of it... where we win is that we do not hold our work of any value... if we did we would be doing it on a canvas and hoarding it or sell it..
graffiti is not dead... thats like saying the gallery is dead... the street is the gallery... the graffiti is the art itself... there are no boundaries... and as far as joyful destruction, i highly doubt the dadaists would be spouting this 'joyful destruction' nonsense if it came down to the people entering their galleries and euthanizing their "higher" valued works...you should be careful, for the most part you are dealing with criminals.
abdn